1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,000
April 25, 2023
Labour Court Berlin

2
00:00:06,920 --> 00:00:09,880
Today I would like to talk about
talk about why we are here

3
00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:13,800
and why we will continue
until we, as we call it,

4
00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:17,800
have won a victory for the working class
have won, especially for those,

5
00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:22,000
who are the most vulnerable in this class
in this class: the migrants and the precarious.

6
00:00:22,120 --> 00:00:25,960
Our struggle and with it
also we, the workers,

7
00:00:26,080 --> 00:00:29,720
who strike without a union
have been forced through an archaic

8
00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:33,880
and shameful detail
in the law.

9
00:00:45,280 --> 00:00:48,960
It is not the Constitution itself,
but the 70-year-old case law,

10
00:00:49,080 --> 00:00:52,600
that criminalizes us, while it itself
has a criminal background.

11
00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:56,760
We will talk shortly
about it again.

12
00:00:57,440 --> 00:00:59,440
So why are we
criminals again?

13
00:01:00,200 --> 00:01:03,680
Because we are on a wildcat strike
against the continuing exploitation

14
00:01:03,800 --> 00:01:06,600
at our old workplace,
Gorillas.

15
00:01:06,880 --> 00:01:09,520
We said no
to an unruly one,

16
00:01:09,640 --> 00:01:11,480
computer-generated
shift system,

17
00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:13,960
which violated the rest period between
the shifts was violated.

18
00:01:14,440 --> 00:01:15,880
We said no

19
00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:19,800
to an obvious crime,
namely, theft in the workplace.

20
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:22,800
I don't know what the law calls it,
but I call it non-payment

21
00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:25,480
an obvious
Form of theft.

22
00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:29,200
Wage theft, which, unlike
to other types of theft.

23
00:01:29,400 --> 00:01:31,960
in no way
justifiable.

24
00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:35,840
Our bosses did not steal,
to get something to eat,

25
00:01:35,960 --> 00:01:41,040
but out of greed for expansion
At the expense of our livelihood.

26
00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:43,120
My boss is not
my friend,

27
00:01:43,240 --> 00:01:44,760
my boss is not
my family

28
00:01:44,960 --> 00:01:48,120
and my workplace is not mine
and is not my home.

29
00:01:48,240 --> 00:01:51,400
I do not lend anything to my boss.
I don't owe him anything.

30
00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:54,680
Then how come that,
what you are doing is not a crime,

31
00:01:54,880 --> 00:01:56,800
but that we,
if we are in favor of that,

32
00:01:57,000 --> 00:02:02,760
what rightfully belongs to us,
are criminalized?

33
00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:05,160
I repeat what I
said last year:

34
00:02:05,280 --> 00:02:08,360
Without the right to strike,
without union representation

35
00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:11,200
our work is
nothing but slavery,

36
00:02:11,440 --> 00:02:13,760
legalized by the
Law of some judges,

37
00:02:13,960 --> 00:02:16,800
who decades ago created
Jurisprudence created.

38
00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:19,440
I name him again
Hans Carl Nipperdey,

39
00:02:19,880 --> 00:02:23,280
who enforced the Führer&nbsp;
principle in the factories,

40
00:02:23,440 --> 00:02:27,280
who participated in the drafting&nbsp;of the&nbsp;
Labor Code during the Nazi era,

41
00:02:27,480 --> 00:02:29,880
was of course not a criminal,
because it was punishable,

42
00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:32,080
if in those years
not a war crime

43
00:02:32,200 --> 00:02:35,400
or crimes against
Humanity committed.

44
00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:38,080
- This is a very interesting
Way to read,

45
00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:41,080
what is a crime against
Humanity and what is not.

46
00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:45,400
This is the bourgeois reading of
Crimes against humanity,

47
00:02:45,480 --> 00:02:49,240
the same ideology that is now
criminalized instead of the bosses.

48
00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:51,040
This is the bourgeois
democracy.

49
00:02:51,160 --> 00:02:54,400
More cannot be expected,
but only be fought for.

50
00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:58,520
All strikes were forbidden according&nbsp;
to Nipperdey's expert opinion,

51
00:02:58,640 --> 00:03:01,200
if they are not organized by a
organized by a trade union

52
00:03:01,400 --> 00:03:02,800
and apply to collective&nbsp;
bargaining agreements.

53
00:03:03,040 --> 00:03:05,960
We often say that the German
right to strike is restrictive.

54
00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:09,680
Let me define it more precisely:
It is non-existent.

55
00:03:09,880 --> 00:03:11,800
It is slaughtered.

56
00:03:11,920 --> 00:03:15,760
The current so-called right to strike
does not concern the essence of the strike.

57
00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:18,320
It would be better to call it
Law of Negotiation.

58
00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:22,800
It is better called 
the negotiation law.

59
00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:27,000
How are we supposed 
to negotiate not getting paid?

60
00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:29,280
How to negotiate&nbsp;
Illegal shift system?

61
00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:32,480
How to negotiate getting fired
on the last day of your probation?

62
00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:37,160
These workplaces are dancing&nbsp;so&nbsp;
smoothly with crime and non-punishment,

63
00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:39,360
walking on the&nbsp;
very lines of it

64
00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:42,400
and even stepping into it,
but still getting away with it.

65
00:03:42,720 --> 00:03:46,680
Whereas for us, striking is 
punishable by losing our jobs.

66
00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:50,440
And we are blamed to be 
"anti-unions" in some arguments.

67
00:03:50,560 --> 00:03:52,680
"Radical left", "leftist bubble".

68
00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:56,800
These were the adjectives
and some nouns that were given to us.

69
00:03:57,360 --> 00:03:59,560
It's not that we are 
against the trade unions,

70
00:03:59,840 --> 00:04:02,040
but one thing has to 
be understood perfectly:

71
00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:05,440
The transitions in these workplaces,
the temporary contracts,

72
00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:09,840
the frequent turnover, the dependencies
such as residence, visa, etc.

73
00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:12,840
do not make it possible
for long term unionizing.

74
00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:17,040
Our conditions are precarious,
but so are these workplaces themselves.

75
00:04:17,400 --> 00:04:21,120
They run on investors money
and their life is dependent on

76
00:04:21,240 --> 00:04:25,440
if their PR can create a need for them
in society or not.

77
00:04:25,880 --> 00:04:29,040
And in the
if not scenario, poof, they're gone.

78
00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:33,120
Today, long term unionizing,
speaking for food delivery sector

79
00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:36,440
has only been possible,
amplified only in some cities

80
00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:40,040
because differential as a company
is the most solid when it comes to existing.

81
00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:45,000
But today we can talk about gorillas anymore
as it is bought by another similar company.

82
00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:49,320
We have no choice
but wildcat strike against the spontaneity

83
00:04:50,280 --> 00:04:51,520
of the exploitation.

84
00:04:51,640 --> 00:04:53,840
It doesn't wait for trade union brokers see.

85
00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:55,960
It keeps growing and expanding.

86
00:04:56,160 --> 00:05:02,160
And one word for they get bad trade unions,
social partnership positions, positions

87
00:05:02,280 --> 00:05:06,680
them as a bridge, whereas they must be
without a shadow of doubt.

88
00:05:06,800 --> 00:05:08,760
The workers representatives.

89
00:05:08,880 --> 00:05:13,160
It shifts their focus on the more stable
workplace workplaces.

90
00:05:13,440 --> 00:05:15,840
It is not the transience of the workers.

91
00:05:15,960 --> 00:05:19,600
It is the instability of the companies
or the stability of the companies.

92
00:05:19,720 --> 00:05:20,640
What attracts them?

93
00:05:20,760 --> 00:05:25,480
If they are stable, they are worth
their focus, not the other way around.

94
00:05:25,640 --> 00:05:29,640
Social partnership is another way
of bourgeois ideology which criminalizes

95
00:05:29,760 --> 00:05:34,880
our struggle and us to tame the working class
because they are well aware

96
00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:39,400
it is only our label Labor
which they are deadly dependent on.

97
00:05:39,560 --> 00:05:43,600
In a scenario where it is withheld
without control, like in a wildcat

98
00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:47,760
and or political strikes,
it is not only a financial

99
00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:51,840
but also an existential
and ideological catastrophe for them.

100
00:05:52,440 --> 00:05:57,480
I repeat again, without our right to strikes,
with our trade unions,

101
00:05:57,720 --> 00:06:03,280
it is nothing but modern and legalized
by the law itself, sort of slavery.

102
00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:07,320
That's why and for many other reasons,
we have to fight for a comprehensive

103
00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:10,320
right to strike. Thank you.

